ZeusLock vs Strac: EU sovereignty vs US-hosted modern DLP

AI surface coverage

Where each product enforces controls on the most-used GenAI surfaces, by what each vendor publishes on their own site.

How each product intercepts data

The architectural path a sensitive prompt takes from the user's keyboard to the AI model.

At a glance

Detection capability — close to feature parity

Strac publishes a detector library of 100+ built-in classifiers covering PII (SSN, passport numbers, driver licences, dates of birth, addresses), PHI (medical records, ICD-10 codes, prescriptions), PCI (credit cards, bank accounts, routing numbers), API keys and secrets. ZeusLock's detector library covers the same baseline plus the European defaults that matter to French and EU auditors: SIRET, SIREN, INSEE, EU VAT, NHS numbers, and source-code IP detection (proprietary code, internal class names, API surfaces). Neither product is materially stronger on detection capability — the difference is which sensitive-data corpus matches your organisation's primary regulatory exposure.

Integration breadth — where Strac wins on SaaS, ZeusLock on agents

Strac's public integrations page lists 60+ integrations across SaaS (Slack, Gmail, Office 365, Notion, Salesforce, Jira, Box, OneDrive, HubSpot, Intercom, Confluence, SharePoint, Teams, Zoom, Asana and many more), cloud and database (AWS S3 / CloudWatch / DynamoDB, Azure Blob, PostgreSQL, Snowflake, Oracle), and a dedicated MCP DLP layer with 23 connectors. If your DLP scope includes scanning Salesforce records, Zendesk tickets and Box files, Strac has the wider catalogue today. ZeusLock concentrates on the GenAI surface and exposes a REST API for custom integrations — narrower coverage of "data at rest in SaaS apps" but deeper coverage of "data in motion to AI models".

Compliance posture — published certifications and regulatory framing

Strac publishes SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS and CCPA on its trust pages — a strong roster for a US healthcare-and-fintech customer base. ZeusLock publishes SOC 2 Type II (claimed) and GDPR, with ISO 27001 in progress, and adds explicit EU AI Act, NIS2 and DORA reporting templates — the regulations that matter to a French CISO preparing for a Banque de France review or to a public-sector buyer under the new EU framework. Neither vendor is universally better on compliance; they are each calibrated to a different procurement file.

Sovereignty and CLOUD Act exposure

Strac is a US-domiciled vendor (Y Combinator W22 batch), and the US CLOUD Act applies to data it processes regardless of geographic storage. The Strac website does not specify a particular hosting region. For an EU customer under DORA outsourcing rules or French sovereignty requirements, this is a flag — not a disqualifier, but a flag that must be assessed against the customer's risk appetite. ZeusLock is a French SASU operating from AWS Paris (eu-west-3) and offers an on-premise Sovereign Edition that removes the exposure entirely. For banking, defence, healthcare and public-sector buyers under DORA, NIS2 and French sovereignty rules, this is the architectural difference that often decides the procurement.

Pricing transparency and procurement velocity

ZeusLock publishes per-seat list pricing on its website (€4 Starter, €7 Business, Enterprise on quote) with a 14-day free trial and a 30-day proof of concept — a fast-track procurement path for EU buyers. Strac is custom-quote pricing only: a 30-minute scoping call yields an itemised quote within 24 hours, with proof of value available before commitment. Strac's approach is internally consistent and well-suited to its larger SaaS-DLP deployments; ZeusLock's published-price approach is simpler for fast pilots and budget owners who do not want a sales cycle to evaluate fit.

Frequently asked questions